CLASSIFIEDDeclassified FILE NO. 021 SHEET 1 OF 3

Documents

Official files, each with a short plain-language summary.

  • OFFICIAL The Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library, Israel Antiquities Authority · DATE TO VERIFY
    The Dead Sea Scrolls – Discovery and Publication ↗ deadseascrolls.org.il

    The custodian's own account: a young Bedouin shepherd's find in 1947, ten more caves over nine years, remains of over 900 manuscripts, slow publication by a small team, and most official editions published by 2001.

  • OFFICIAL The Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library, Israel Antiquities Authority · DATE TO VERIFY
    The Dead Sea Scrolls – Introduction ↗ deadseascrolls.org.il

    What the scrolls contain: about 230 biblical manuscripts and many non-biblical texts, a quarter of them 'sectarian'; mostly Hebrew, about 15% Aramaic, several Greek; dated from the third century BCE to the first century CE.

    “While Hebrew is the most frequently used language in the Scrolls, about 15% were written in Aramaic and several in Greek.” source
  • OFFICIAL Library of Congress (exhibition) · DATE TO VERIFY
    Scrolls From the Dead Sea: The Ancient Library of Qumran and Modern Scholarship – Two Thousand Years Later ↗ loc.gov

    The exhibition's section on the modern story: accidental discovery by Bedouin shepherds in 1947, the access dispute of the late 1980s, the 1991 photographic edition and the Huntington Library's release, and the widening of the editorial team.

    “no controversy has been more heated than that surrounding access to the scrolls” source
  • OFFICIAL A. J. T. Jull, D. J. Donahue, M. Broshi & E. Tov, Radiocarbon 37(1), 11–19 · 1995
    Radiocarbon dating of scrolls and linen fragments from the Judean Desert ↗ experts.azregents.edu

    Peer-reviewed radiocarbon measurements of 18 texts and two linen fragments from Qumran Caves 1, 2 and 4 and Nahal Hever; the results agree well with ages estimated from handwriting.

    “The radiocarbon results are in good agreement with estimates of age based on paleography.” source

    University of Arizona research record; open-access PDF in the University of Arizona repository (hdl.handle.net/10150/653405), which returned HTTP 403 to our tool.

  • OFFICIAL Museum of the Bible · 2020-03-13
    A Journey for the Truth: Investigating the Recent Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments ↗ museumofthebible.org

    The museum's own account: BAM testing of five fragments (report October 2018), an independent Art Fraud Insights investigation in 2019, and the conclusion that all 16 of its fragments are modern forgeries. Links the full scientific report.

    “none of the textual fragments in the Museum of the Bible's Dead Sea Scroll collection are authentic” source
  • COMMENTARY Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh · 1991
    The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception ↗ archive.org

    Catalogue record for the best-known ‘suppression’ book (New York: Summit Books, 1991).

    “The Dead Sea scrolls deception” source

    Internet Archive record; used for publication details only, the book was not read.

Convinced?
Dead Sea Scrolls, photograph by Willem van de Poll (Nationaal Archief, CC0; the archive dates it 1948, to be verified)
Entrance of a Qumran cave where scrolls were found, Willem van de Poll (Nationaal Archief, CC0)